A newer version of this project is available. See below for other available versions.
35 Years After CLIA 1988
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Jaime Nieto Sierra, Drexel University; David Gefen, Drexel University
Version: View help for Version V1
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
application/x-spss-sav | 50.4 KB | 07/05/2024 10:04:AM |
Project Citation:
Nieto Sierra, Jaime, and Gefen, David. 35 Years After CLIA 1988 . Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2024-07-05. https://doi.org/10.3886/E207701V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
The
Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) regulations of 1988 required
certification of some clinical laboratory professionals but not of others. Analyzing
survey data 35 years later, we explore how laboratory professionals today are inadvertently
affected by those regulations, specifically their sense of professional identity
and their perceptions of justice—and the consequences of those on their turnover
intentions. Turnover is a major concern among laboratory professionals. Survey results
show that even 35 years after the unintended disenfranchisement caused by CLIA,
clinical laboratory professionals whose specialty was included in CLIA have a
stronger sense of being an ingroup, expressed as positive professional identity,
and had a higher assessment of there being procedural and distributive justice
than those excluded in CLIA. Turnover intentions, however, were primarily a
matter of negative professional identity and reduced distributive justice.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
social identity;
professional identity;
procedural justice;
justice;
Justice theory;
Distributive justice ;
turnover intentions
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
survey data
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.