A newer version of this project is available. See below for other available versions.
2023 California Delta Residents Survey
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Jessica Rudnick, University of California-San Diego; Kenji Tomari, University of California - Davis; Kristin Dobbin, University of California-Berkeley; Mark Lubell, University of California- Davis; Kelly Biedenweg, Oregon State University
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
Restricted-Use-Data-Info | 12/02/2023 08:42:PM | ||
2023 DRS Results Summary Report.pdf | application/pdf | 20.9 MB | 12/02/2023 11:46:AM |
2023 DRS Survey Instrument.pdf | application/pdf | 877.3 KB | 11/30/2023 02:28:PM |
DRS Data Sharing Agreement_2023-DEC.docx | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 34.9 KB | 12/02/2023 03:43:PM |
DRS public data_2023_12_01.zip | application/zip | 216.2 KB | 12/02/2023 02:02:PM |
Map 1- DRS Sampling Boundaries.pdf | application/pdf | 1.8 MB | 11/30/2023 04:06:PM |
Map 2-DRS Respondents Across Zones.png | image/png | 3.2 MB | 11/02/2023 08:16:AM |
Project Citation:
Project Description
The data were collected via a survey (available online through Qualtrics or as a print version), with survey invitations sent by mail to a random sample of 82,000 household addresses in the rural “Primary Zone” of the Delta (survey Zone 1), the suburban and urban “Secondary Zone” of the Delta (survey Zone 2) and Delta-adjacent “EJ Communities” in South Sacramento and South Stockton (survey Zone 3). Maps of the survey zones are available in project documentation and the Results Summary Report. The survey was available in English and Spanish. Over 2,300 responses were received, constituting a 2.9 percent response rate.
The survey included 43 multiple choice and short response questions, broken up into five sections around key themes:
- Sense of place and way of life
- Regional priorities, concerns, and quality of life
- Environmental and climate change experiences, concerns, and policy preferences
- Civic engagement and good governance
- Demographics
Additional resources, including summary report of results and other research products using the data, are posted on our project website as they become available: https://ktomari.github.io/DeltaResidentsSurvey/.
We also have a GitHub repository, where R scripts (and accompanying plain-text descriptions of the functions used that can be translated into other programming languages) are posted, which provide the easiest way for reading in the data and ensuring variable types are set correctly. We highly recommend using or referencing these scripts for the easiest and most accurate use of the data: https://github.com/ktomari/DeltaResidentsSurvey.
Scope of Project
To protect respondent privacy, certain geographic, demographic, and survey response variables belonging to the original dataset are restricted from general public dissemination. Users interested in obtaining these data must complete a Data Sharing Agreement for the use of confidential data, submit a Data Request Form to the research team that specifies the reasons for their request, research questions, and specific variables they seek to use, and obtain IRB approval or notice of exemption for their research. To learn more, first review the Data Sharing Agreement available in project documents and then review available materials in the "Restricted Use Data Information" folder.
Data format:
- Public dataset is provided as a .csv
- Codebook explaining all variables in the dataset is provided as a .xls
- A .txt file is provided containing the hash code of the dataset file. It is recommended to obtain the hash code of the dataset csv you download and validate that it matches the hash code we provide in the text file. This ensures the data file has not been corrupted or changed in any way during the download process.
We have a GitHub repository, where R scripts (and accompanying plain-text descriptions of the functions used that can be translated into other programming languages) are posted, which provide the easiest way for reading in the data and ensuring variable types are set correctly. We highly recommend using or referencing these scripts for the easiest and most accurate use of the data: https://github.com/ktomari/DeltaResidentsSurvey.
Methodology
Survey zone 1 (Delta Primary Zone): 5.7% response rate
Survey zone 2 (Delta Secondary Zone): 2.5% response rate
Survey zone 3 (Delta EJ communities): 3.4% response rate
All response rates calculated following the American Association for
Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) response rate calculator-v3.
The survey was distributed to residential addresses in three survey zones (strata), based off of the legal boundaries of the Delta:
- Zone 1: (“Delta Primary Zone”, including Rio Vista): Rural area in the heart of the Delta.
- Zone 2: (“Delta Secondary Zone”): Surrounding the primary zone, includes suburban/ urban areas of cities of Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley, Pittsburg, Sacramento, West Sacramento, Stockton, Tracy
- Zone 3: Comprised of two urban areas, one in south Sacramento and one in south Stockton, lying outside of, but just adjacent to, the legal boundary of the Delta Secondary Zone (zone 2). This zone included communities known to bear disproportionate environmental harm burden. These areas are defined by California’s Community Air Protection Program1 (CAPP; responsive to 2017 Assembly Bill 617), which defined boundaries at a very local level for communities highly impacted by environmental harms. The program includes communities in South Stockton & South Sacramento/Florin, which the research team adopted for the 2023 DRS for the purpose of reaching Delta adjacent, highly impacted and socially vulnerable communities.
- If part of a CBG is inside a zone and part is outside of all zones, include the full CBG in the zone.
- If a CBG falls into both zones 1 and 2, assign the CBG to whichever of the two zones has the largest population.
- If a CBG falls into both Zone 2 and Zone 3 (which only occurs in Stockton where these two zones overlap), those CBGs go with Zone 2.
Sampling rate:
The survey was distributed to a stratified random sample of addresses within each survey zone. Sampling rates differed between zones due to population size, with the rural zone sampled at a higher rate and suburban/ urban zones sampled at lower rates.
- Zone 1: ~100% of households + traditional post office boxes (physical address does not receive mail) were sampled (4,372 residential addresses + 1,670 PO boxes invitations sent for a total of 6,042 invitations sent)
- Zone 2: 25% of households were sampled (59,175 invitations sent)
- Zone 3: 25% of households were sampled (16,940 invitations sent)
Detailed information on the weighting procedures applied are available in the Summary Report (Appendix C).
Related Publications
Published Versions
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.