Code for: "The Behavioral Foundations of Default Effects: Theory and Evidence from Medicare Part D"
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Zarek Brot-Goldberg, University of Chicago. Harris School of Public Policy; Timothy Layton, Harvard University. Harvard Medical School. Department of Health Care Policy; Boris Vabson, Harvard University. Harvard Medical School. Department of Health Care Policy; Adelina Yanyue Wang, McKinsey & Company
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
Full | 09/29/2023 07:27:PM |
Project Citation:
Project Description
The abstract of the paper is:
We show in two natural experiments that default rules in Medicare Part D have large, persistent effects on enrollment and drug utilization of low-income beneficiaries. The implications of this phenomenon for welfare and optimal policy depend on the sensitivity of passivity to the value of the default option. Using random assignment to default options, we show that beneficiary passivity is extremely insensitive, even when enrolling in the default option would result in substantial drug consumption losses. A third natural experiment suggests that variation in active choice is driven by random transitory shocks rather than the inherent attentiveness of some beneficiaries.
Scope of Project
D90 Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: General
I10 Health: General
I13 Health Insurance, Public and Private
Methodology
Related Publications
Published Versions
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.