Name File Type Size Last Modified
  code 01/27/2023 04:19:PM
  data 11/11/2022 12:01:PM
  output 11/11/2022 02:06:PM
  surveys 11/11/2022 01:51:PM
README.pdf application/pdf 118.3 KB 01/28/2023 10:50:AM
run.do text/plain 3.5 KB 01/28/2023 10:13:AM

Project Citation: 

Ainsworth, Robert, Dehejia, Rajeev, Pop-Eleches, Cristian, and Urquiola, Miguel. Data and Code for: Why do households leave school value added on the table? The roles of information and preferences. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2023. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2023-03-21. https://doi.org/10.3886/E181263V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Romanian households could choose schools with 1 s.d. additional value added. Why do households leave value added "on the table"? We study two possibilities: information and preferences for other school traits. In an experiment, we inform randomly selected households about schools' value added. These households choose schools with between 0.05 and 0.2 s.d. of additional value added. We then estimate a discrete choice model and show that households have strong preferences for peer quality and curriculum in addition to value added, implying that even perfect information would eliminate at most a quarter of the value added that households leave unexploited. 

These materials provide data and code to estimate the results in the paper.
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources Center for Development Economics and Policy, Columbia University; SIPA Faculty Grants Program, Columbia University; New York University; KDI School of Public Policy and Management

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms school choice; value added; information
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      C54 Quantitative Policy Modeling
      D80 Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty: General
      I20 Education and Research Institutions: General
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Romania
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 2004 – 2019
Collection Date(s):  View help for Collection Date(s) 2017 – 2019; 5/1/2019 – 8/1/2019
Universe:  View help for Universe The administrative data cover all students admitted to Romanian high schools. The survey data cover students in 194 middle schools in 48 Romanian towns. 
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) administrative records data; survey data

Methodology

Response Rate:  View help for Response Rate The baseline survey interviewed households of 20% of the students in the 48 survey towns (3,898/19,793). The endline survey interviewed 57% of the baseline respondents who were in experimental middle schools, who intended to apply to tracks in their town, and who were assigned to a track (1,533/2,692). 
Sampling:  View help for Sampling For the baseline survey, towns and middle schools were selected. Towns were chosen as those in which value added was most predictable among towns with between 7 and 28 tracks in 2018. Middle schools were randomly chosen among those that had at least 15 students and in which it was logistically feasible for surveyors to visit schools' high-school information sessions. Surveyors interviewed all parents of 8th graders who attended these sessions, using on-site questionnaires. 

The endline survey took place via phone. Surveyors interviewed baseline respondents who were in experimental middle schools, who intended to apply to tracks in their town, and who were assigned to a track. Experimental middle schools are those in which the baseline survey was successfully implemented in all middle schools in a matched pair.  
Data Source:  View help for Data Source The administrative data come from the Romanian Ministry of Education. The survey data were collected jointly with Nest Data Explorer. 
Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) on-site questionnaire; telephone interview
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Students
Geographic Unit:  View help for Geographic Unit Town

Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.