What we think prayers do
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Linda Thunstrom, University of Wyoming; Shiri Noy, Denison University
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
|
text/plain | 21.9 KB | 03/04/2022 07:33:AM |
|
application/x-stata-dta | 150.5 KB | 03/04/2022 10:04:AM |
|
application/pdf | 473.2 KB | 03/04/2022 10:05:AM |
Project Citation:
Thunstrom, Linda, and Noy, Shiri. What we think prayers do. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-03-04. https://doi.org/10.3886/E163981V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Praying for others in the wake of a disasters is
a common interpersonal and public response to tragedy in the United States. But
these gestures are controversial. In a survey experiment, we elicit how people
value receiving a prayer from a Christian stranger in support of a recent
hardship and examine factors that affect the value of the prayer. We find that
people who positively value receiving the prayer do so primarily because they believe
it provides emotional support and will be answered by God. Many also value the
prayer because they believe it will improve their health and wealth, although empirical
support of such effects is lacking. People who negatively value receiving the
prayer do so primarily because they believe praying is a waste of time. The
negative value is particularly large if people are offended by religion. Finally,
the hardship experienced by the prayer recipient matters to the intensity by
which recipients like or dislike the gesture, suggesting the benefit of prayers
varies not only across people, but also across contexts.
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.