Name File Type Size Last Modified
Guttmacher Clinic Survey 2010 questionnaire.pdf application/pdf 318.3 KB 04/28/2015 06:45:AM
Guttmacher Clinic Survey 2010 user guide and codebook.pdf application/pdf 588.7 KB 03/11/2022 07:24:AM
Guttmacher Clinic Survey 2010.dta application/x-stata-dta 284.5 KB 08/24/2015 01:51:PM

Project Citation: 

Frost, Jennifer J. 2010 Survey of U.S. Publicly Funded Family Planning Clinics . Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-03-31. https://doi.org/10.3886/E163961V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary The Guttmacher Institute has a long history of studying U.S. publicly funded family planning clinics and conducting sample surveys to better understand and document the clinic network’s range of service delivery practices and the challenges it faces. These data are from a survey of a nationally representative sample of publicly funded family planning clinics conducted in 2010–2011 and are both an extension of earlier surveys and an investigation of new topic areas relevant to the provision of clinic services today. A total of 664 publicly funded family planning clinics in the U.S. provided information about the types of contraceptive methods and related services offered onsite and through referral; service delivery practices and protocols, particularly those that have the potential to affect service accessibility, method initiation and continuation, and care for patients with special needs; the types of outreach and special programs offered; protocols and technology used for screening and testing (including for cervical cancer and HIV); services for male partners and clients; service costs and financial challenges; and a variety of other aspects related to clinical practices and management.
Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources United States Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Population Affairs (FPRPA006050)

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms birth control; costs; family planning; health care access; health planning; health services utilization; mdeicaid; outreach programs
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage United States
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 1/2010 – 12/2011
Collection Date(s):  View help for Collection Date(s) 9/2010 – 5/2011
Universe:  View help for Universe Clinics in the United States providing publicly funded contraceptive services
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) survey data

Methodology

Response Rate:  View help for Response Rate 1,294 clinics were surveyed. 664 clinics responded to this survey, 20 clinics refused and 610 never responded. The overall response rate was 51%. Response by provider type was: 75% among Planned Parenthoods, 60% among health departments, 39% among FQHCs and 42% among others.
Sampling:  View help for Sampling The sample was drawn from the 8,114 eligible publicly funded family planning clinics known to us at that time. Sampled clinics were stratified by type (health department, Planned Parenthood, FQHC and other) and whether they received any Title X funding. Clinics were randomly selected within each of the eight resulting categories. Because there are many more clinics of some types than of others, we varied the proportion of each type that was sampled to ensure a sufficient number of cases to make estimates specific to each type. We sampled 28% of Planned Parenthood clinics, 19% of FQHCs, 13% of health departments, and 16% of hospitals and other facilities.
Collection Mode(s):  View help for Collection Mode(s) mail questionnaire
Scales:  View help for Scales N/A
Weights:  View help for Weights All analysis should be weighted. The main weight variable is weight. To obtain accurate standard errors, analysis should also account for sample stratification by using the stratum variable.
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Clinic
Geographic Unit:  View help for Geographic Unit State

Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.