Name File Type Size Last Modified
Letting_the_briber_go_free_dataset.dta application/x-stata-dta 219 KB 07/04/2021 01:05:AM
README.pdf application/pdf 315.1 KB 07/04/2021 01:03:AM
letting_the_briber_go_free.do text/plain 3.9 KB 07/04/2021 01:03:AM
letting_the_briber_go_free_figures.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 61.9 KB 07/04/2021 01:03:AM

Project Citation: 

Abbink, Klaus, Dasgupta, Utteeyo, Gangadharan, Lata, and Jain, Tarun. Files for “Letting the briber go free:  An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2021-07-15. https://doi.org/10.3886/E144461V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary This paper examines the effectiveness of using asymmetric liability to combat harassment bribes. Basu (2011) advocates legal immunity for bribe-givers, while retaining culpability for bribe-takers. Results from our experiment indicate that while this policy has the potential to significantly reduce corrupt practices, weak economic incentives for the bribe-giver, or retaliation by bribe-takers can mitigate the positive disciplining effect of such an implementation. Asymmetric liability on its own may hence face challenges in the field.




, This paper examines the effectiveness of using asymmetric liability to combat harassment bribes. Basu (2011) advocates legal immunity for bribe-givers, while retaining culpability for bribe-takers. Results from our experiment indicate that while this policy has the potential to significantly reduce corrupt practices, weak economic incentives for the bribe-giver, or retaliation by bribe-takers can mitigate the positive disciplining effect of such an implementation. Asymmetric liability on its own may hence face challenges in the field.




Funding Sources:  View help for Funding Sources Monash University; Indian School of Business

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms Harassment bribes; Experiment; Asymmetric Penalty; Retaliation
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage India
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 2012 – 2012
Collection Date(s):  View help for Collection Date(s) 1/2012 – 2/2012
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) experimental data; survey data

Methodology

Weights:  View help for Weights None
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Individual

Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.