Chance Elections, Social Distancing Restrictions, and Kentucky’s Early COVID-19 Experience
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Charles Courtemanche, University of Kentucky; Aaron Yelowitz, University of Kentucky; Joshua Pinkston, University of Louisville; Anh Le, University of Kentucky; Joseph Garuccio, Georgia Sate University
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
KY_COVID19.dta | application/x-stata-dta | 100.8 MB | 05/13/2021 09:11:AM |
Stata generated codebook.txt | text/plain | 154.4 KB | 05/13/2021 08:59:AM |
Project Citation:
Project Description
In order to obtain results with more direct applicability to Kentucky, we then estimate a model that interacts the policy variables with a “white working class” index characterized by political conservatism, rurality, and high percentages of white, evangelical Christian residents without college degrees. We find that the effectiveness of early social distancing measures decreased with higher values of this index. The results imply that the restrictions combined to slow the spread of COVID-19 by 12 percentage points per day in Kentucky’s two largest urban counties but had no statistically detectable effect across the rest of the state.
Scope of Project
Methodology
Cases, deaths, and initial intervention data: Johns Hopkins University University
Election data: MIT Election Data and Science Lab and the Harvard Dataverse
Evangelical data: U.S. Religion Census Religious Congregations and Membership Study, 2010
County population data: United States Department of Agriculture
Other county level data: Killeen et al. (Johns Hopkins University).
Related Publications
Published Versions
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.