Data and Code for: Rational Inattention in the Infield
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Vivek Bhattacharya, Northwestern University; Greg Howard, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
codebooks | 12/21/2020 04:14:PM | ||
data | 12/21/2020 04:17:PM | ||
exhibits | 12/21/2020 04:16:PM | ||
output | 12/21/2020 04:14:PM | ||
raw | 12/21/2020 06:19:PM | ||
temp | 12/21/2020 04:18:PM | ||
LICENSE.txt | text/plain | 8.5 KB | 02/25/2021 09:50:AM |
README.txt | text/plain | 17.8 KB | 02/25/2021 11:06:AM |
all_data.dta | application/x-stata | 2.3 GB | 12/21/2020 07:02:AM |
batter_robustness.do | text/x-stata-syntax | 2.6 KB | 12/21/2020 06:57:AM |
- Total of 39 records. Records per page
- « previous Page of 4
- next »
Project Citation:
Bhattacharya, Vivek, and Howard, Greg. Data and Code for: Rational Inattention in the Infield. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2022. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-10-21. https://doi.org/10.3886/E129501V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This paper provides evidence of rational inattention by experienced professionals in strategic interactions. We add rational inattention to a game of matching pennies with state-dependent payoffs. Unlike the full-information mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium, payoffs of different actions need not be equated state-by-state. Moreover, players respond partially to payoff differences, this responsiveness is stronger when attention costs are lower, strategies converge to full-information Nash as stakes increase, and average payoffs across all states are approximately equal across actions. We test these predictions using data on millions of pitches from Major League Baseball, where we observe strategies, payoffs, and proxies for attention costs.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
behavioral economics;
rational inattention;
cognitive costs
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
C72 Noncooperative Games
D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
D91 Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
C72 Noncooperative Games
D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
D91 Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
United States
Time Period(s):
View help for Time Period(s)
2008 – 2017
Collection Date(s):
View help for Collection Date(s)
2/6/2020 – 2/6/2020 (Date MLB GameDay data was scraped)
Universe:
View help for Universe
Major League Baseball players
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
event/transaction data
Collection Notes:
View help for Collection Notes
The data is collected from the following sources:
- MLB's Pitchf/x and Gameday systems
- Bill Petti's Baseball Tools website (https://billpetti.github.io/baseball_tools/)
- Fangraphs (www.fangraphs.com)
- ESPN analysis (http://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/12331388/the-great-analytics-rankings)
- Baseball Reference (www.baseball-reference.com)
- Greg Stoll's analysis, via Retrosheet (www.retrosheet.org)
- Tom Tango's analysis (www.insidethebook.com)
Methodology
Unit(s) of Observation:
View help for Unit(s) of Observation
Actions (usually pitches) in a baseball game
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.