Name File Type Size Last Modified
do for empathy.do text/x-stata-syntax 1.5 KB 11/09/2020 10:30:AM
do for lettercount.do text/x-stata-syntax 1.2 KB 11/09/2020 10:43:AM
do for math.do text/x-stata-syntax 10.8 KB 11/09/2020 10:56:PM
empathy.dta application/x-stata 763.6 KB 11/09/2020 10:27:AM
lettercount.dta application/x-stata 2 MB 11/04/2020 03:03:AM
math.dta application/x-stata 16 MB 11/09/2020 10:23:PM

Project Citation: 

Regev, Tali. DO GENDERED LANGUAGES FAIL WOMEN IN MATH? Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-11-10. https://doi.org/10.3886/E126081V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Data and code provided for:

 "The effect of language on behavior: do gendered languages fail women in math?"
Abstract:
Research suggests that gendered languages are associated with gender inequality.  However, because languages are embedded in cultures, evidence for causal effects are harder to provide. We contribute to this ongoing debate by exploring the relationship between gendered languages and the gender gap in mathematics achievements. We provide evidence for causality by exploiting the prominent (but not exclusive) practice in gendered languages of using masculine generics to address women. In an experiment on a large representative sample of the Hebrew-speaking adult population in Israel, we show that addressing women in the feminine, compared to addressing them in the masculine, reduces the gender gap in mathematics achievements by a third. These effects are stronger among participants who acquired the Hebrew language early in childhood rather than later in life, suggesting that it is the extent of language proficiency that generates one's sensitivity to being addressed in the masculine or in the feminine. Moreover, when women are addressed in the masculine, their efforts (in terms of time spent on the math test) decrease and they report feeling that ‘science is for men’ more than when addressed in the feminine. We supplement the analysis with two experiments that explore the roles of general and task specific stereotypes in generating these effects.


Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms gender stereotypes; language; achievement tests
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Israel
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 12/7/2016 – 7/19/2018 (December 2016, July 2018)
Universe:  View help for Universe A representative sample of the adult (18+) Hebrew speaking population in Israel.
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) experimental data
Collection Notes:  View help for Collection Notes Participants recruited by Dialogue, a survey company.


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.