Assessing the Roles and Challenges of Librarians in Dental Systematic and Scoping Reviews
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Nena Schvaneveldt, University of Utah; Elizabeth M. Stellrecht, State University of New York. University at Buffalo
Version: View help for Version V2
| Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
application/pdf | 186.7 KB | 06/03/2020 07:48:AM |
|
|
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet | 25.1 KB | 05/28/2020 10:53:AM |
Project Citation:
Schvaneveldt, Nena, and Stellrecht, Elizabeth M. . Assessing the Roles and Challenges of Librarians in Dental Systematic and Scoping Reviews. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-06-03. https://doi.org/10.3886/E119644V2
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
This study will determine the scope of experience, roles, and challenges librarians face in dental and oral health systematic and scoping reviews. The study aims to establish the current level of librarian involvement with reviews in this environment. The data obtained will inform outreach efforts to subject researchers as well as identify areas for librarians’ professional development. Based on two recently published articles about health science librarian roles and challenges in systematic and scoping reviews, the authors developed a 16-item survey. The survey was distributed via electronic mailing list to librarians who were likely to have participated in conducting these reviews. After being open for two weeks, the survey was closed and descriptive analysis was performed on the results.
Scope of Project
Subject Terms:
View help for Subject Terms
systematic reviews;
scoping reviews;
dentistry
Geographic Coverage:
View help for Geographic Coverage
Canada,
USA,
Europe
Collection Date(s):
View help for Collection Date(s)
1/17/2020 – 1/31/2020
Universe:
View help for Universe
Information professionals who conduct systematic or scoping reviews in dentistry and/or oral health
Data Type(s):
View help for Data Type(s)
survey data
Methodology
Response Rate:
View help for Response Rate
The total number of dental librarians who have participated in systematic and scoping reviews is unknown, therefore the response rate is unknown
Sampling:
View help for Sampling
Individuals who were likely to have conducted systematic and scoping reviews were contacted via electronic mailing lists: MEDLIB-L, two caucuses of the Medical Library Association (i.e. Dental, Systematic Reviews), the Canada Health Libraries Association Oral Health Interest Group, the American Dental Education Association Evidence Based Dentistry Special Interest Group, and the ExpertSearching electronic mailing list
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.