CSSS Survey Data Analysis for AERAOpen
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Megan Hopkins, University of California-San Diego
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
CSSS-Survey-Data-Analysis.do | text/x-stata-syntax | 1.1 KB | 12/09/2019 12:55:PM |
CSSS-Survey-Data-Anonymized.dta | application/x-stata | 20.6 KB | 12/09/2019 12:43:PM |
CSSS-Survey-Year-2.pdf | application/pdf | 469.8 KB | 12/09/2019 12:43:PM |
READ_ME_FIRST.docx | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 12.7 KB | 12/09/2019 12:49:PM |
Project Citation:
Hopkins, Megan. CSSS Survey Data Analysis for AERAOpen. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-12-09. https://doi.org/10.3886/E116586V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
These files contain the anonymized data and analysis files used to create Table 2 and some of the findings found in "Boundary Crossing in Professional Association: The Dynamics of Research Use Among State Leaders and Researchers in a Research Practice Partnership." The study examined how interactions between researchers and practitioners shape opportunities for research use in a professional association engaged in RPP activities focused on fostering change in statewide K–12 science education. Drawing on a conceptualization of RPPs as joint work at boundaries, it shows how both researchers and practitioners facilitated research use. Furthermore, research use was facilitated by brokers’ engagement in RPP activities and with shared pieces of research.
Funding Sources:
View help for Funding Sources
United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences (R305C140008)
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.