Replication data for: Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Marianne Bertrand; Sendhil Mullainathan
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
LICENSE.txt | text/plain | 14.6 KB | 12/06/2019 10:19:AM |
lakisha_aer.dta | application/octet-stream | 1 MB | 12/06/2019 10:19:AM |
Project Citation:
Bertrand, Marianne, and Mullainathan, Sendhil. Replication data for: Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2004. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-12-06. https://doi.org/10.3886/E116023V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
We study race in the labor market by sending fictitious resumes to help-wanted ads in Boston and Chicago newspapers. To manipulate perceived race, resumes are randomly assigned African-American- or White-sounding names. White names receive 50 percent more callbacks for interviews. Callbacks are also more responsive to resume quality for White names than for African-American ones. The racial gap is uniform across occupation, industry, and employer size. We also find little evidence that employers are inferring social class from the names. Differential treatment by race still appears to still be prominent in the U. S. labor market.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
J15 Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
J71 Labor Discrimination
J15 Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
J71 Labor Discrimination
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.