National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA): Religious, Civic, and Social Organizations by Census Tract, United States, 2003-2017

Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Jessica Finlay, University of Michigan. Institute for Social Research; Mao Li, University of Michigan. Institute for Social Research; Michael Esposito, University of Michigan. Institute for Social Research; Iris Gomez-Lopez, University of Michigan. Institute for Social Research; Anam Khan, University of Michigan. Institute for Social Research. Survey Research Center; Philippa Clarke, University of Michigan. Institute for Social Research; Megan Chenoweth, University of Michigan Institute for Social Research

Version: View help for Version V2

Name	File Type	Size	Last Modified
NaNDA_Religious_Civic_Social_Orgs_by_Census_Tract_2003-2017_v1-1.pdf	application/pdf	211.4 KB	12/07/2020 11:02:AM
nanda_relcivso0317T_01P.sas7bdat	application/x-sas-data	151.8 MB	10/20/2020 11:12:AM
nanda_relcivsoc_tract_2003-2017_01P.dta	application/x-stata	80.1 MB	10/19/2020 07:54:AM
nanda_relcivsoc_tract_2003-2017_01P_csv_with_readme.zip	application/zip	24.5 MB	10/19/2020 07:49:AM

Project Citation:

Finlay, Jessica, Li, Mao, Esposito, Michael, Gomez-Lopez, Iris, Khan, Anam, Clarke, Philippa, and Chenoweth, Megan. National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA): Religious, Civic, and Social Organizations by Census Tract, United States, 2003-2017. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-10-20. https://doi.org/10.3886/E115967V2

Project Description

Summary: This dataset contains measures of the number and per capita density of select types of religious, civic, and social organizations – such as churches, mosques, synagogues, ethnic associations, and veterans’ associations – per United States census tract from 2003 through 2017.

Funding Sources: United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Community Living. National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (90RTHF0001); United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Institute on Aging (RF1-AG-057540)

Scope of Project

Subject Terms: third places; religious organizations; mosques; synagogues; fraternities; sororities; clubs; churches

Geographic Coverage: United States

Time Period(s): 2003 – 2017 (2003-2015, 2017)

Collection Date(s): 2020 – 2020

Universe: Religious, civic, and social organizations in all census tracts in the United States, including Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands.

Data Type(s): aggregate data

Methodology

Data Source:

The 2017 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS, https://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/sssd/naics/naicsrch?chart=2017) was used to identify religious, civic, and social organizations.
Establishment data was taken from the 2017 National Establishment Time Series (NETS) database.
Establishment census tracts, as well as land area per tract, were determined using the 2010 version of the US TIGER/Line shapefiles (https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2010/TRACT/2010/tl_2010_us_tract10.zip).
Census tract population figures for 2000-2010 are drawn from the NaNDA dataset Neighborhood Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics of Census Tracts, United States, 2000-2010 (https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/111107/).
Population figures for 2011-2017 were obtained from the NaNDA dataset Socioeconomic Status and Demographic Characteristics of Census Tracts, United States, 2008-2017 (https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/119451/).

Unit(s) of Observation: census tract, year

Geographic Unit: census tract

Related Publications

This study is un-published. See below for other available versions.

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Dublin Core

DDI 2.5

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.