Replication data for: Ideology as Opinion: A Spatial Model of Common-Value Elections
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Joseph McMurray
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
MIC2016-0040_data | 10/12/2019 10:48:PM | ||
|
text/plain | 14.6 KB | 10/12/2019 06:48:PM |
Project Citation:
McMurray, Joseph. Replication data for: Ideology as Opinion: A Spatial Model of Common-Value Elections. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2017. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E114352V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Spatial election literature attributes voters' political differences to irreconcilable conflicts of interest. Alternatively, voters may merely hold differing beliefs regarding which policies best promote the public interest, as in the classic common-value model of Condorcet (1785). This paper shows how a spatial version of the common-value model explains empirical patterns of public opinion, ideology, electoral margins, and participation that are puzzling from the standard perspective, suggesting that voters may implicitly view politics as a contest between truth and error. If so, this has important consequences for political analysis.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
D71 Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
D71 Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.