Replication data for: Federal Budget Policy with an Aging Population and Persistently Low Interest Rates
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Douglas W. Elmendorf; Louise M. Sheiner
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
data_appendix | 10/12/2019 06:35:PM | ||
|
text/plain | 14.6 KB | 10/12/2019 02:35:PM |
Project Citation:
Elmendorf, Douglas W., and Sheiner, Louise M. Replication data for: Federal Budget Policy with an Aging Population and Persistently Low Interest Rates. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2017. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E113994V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Some observers have argued that the projections for high and rising debt pose a grave threat to the country's economic future and give the government less fiscal space to respond to recessions or other unexpected developments, so they urge significant changes in tax or spending policies to reduce federal borrowing.
In stark contrast, others have noted that interest rates on long-term federal debt are extremely low and have argued that such persistently low interest rates justify additional federal borrowing and investment, at least for the short and medium term.
We analyze this controversy focusing on two main issues: the aging of the US population and interest rates on US government debt. It is generally understood that these factors play an important role in the projected path of the US debt-to-GDP ratio.
What is less recognized is that these changes also have implications for the appropriate level of US debt. We argue that many—though not all—of the factors that may be contributing to the historically low level of interest rates imply that both federal debt and federal investment should be substantially larger than they would be otherwise.
In conclusion, although significant policy changes to reduce federal budget deficits ultimately will be needed, they do not have to be implemented right away.
Instead, the focus of federal budget policy over the coming decade should be to increase federal investment while enacting changes in federal spending and taxes that will reduce deficits gradually over time.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
E23 Macroeconomics: Production
E43 Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
E62 Fiscal Policy
H61 National Budget; Budget Systems
H63 National Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt
J11 Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
E23 Macroeconomics: Production
E43 Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects
E62 Fiscal Policy
H61 National Budget; Budget Systems
H63 National Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt
J11 Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.