Name File Type Size Last Modified
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/12/2019 08:11:AM
Readme_2007_0018.pdf application/pdf 11 KB 10/12/2019 08:11:AM
mkbasic.do text/plain 6.4 KB 10/12/2019 08:11:AM
nycmayoralsurveydata.dta application/octet-stream 380.2 KB 10/12/2019 08:11:AM
senracelist.dta application/octet-stream 4 KB 10/12/2019 08:11:AM
table10.do text/plain 2.5 KB 10/12/2019 08:11:AM
table5.do text/plain 3.3 KB 10/12/2019 08:11:AM
table6.do text/plain 3.4 KB 10/12/2019 08:11:AM
table6_se.do text/plain 4.6 KB 10/12/2019 08:11:AM
table7.do text/plain 2.8 KB 10/12/2019 08:11:AM

Project Citation: 

Mullainathan, Sendhil, and Washington, Ebonya. Replication data for: Sticking with Your Vote: Cognitive Dissonance and Political Attitudes. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2009. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E113555V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Cognitive dissonance theory predicts that the act of voting for a candidate leads to a more favorable opinion of the candidate in the future. We find support for the empirical relevance of cognitive dissonance to political attitudes. We examine the presidential opinion ratings of voting-age eligibles and ineligibles two years after the president's election. We find that eligibles show two to three times greater polarization of opinions than comparable ineligibles. We find smaller effects when we compare polarization in opinions of senators elected during high turnout presidential campaign years with senators elected during nonpresidential campaign years. (JEL D72)

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.