Replication data for: Sticking with Your Vote: Cognitive Dissonance and Political Attitudes
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Sendhil Mullainathan; Ebonya Washington
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
LICENSE.txt | text/plain | 14.6 KB | 10/12/2019 08:11:AM |
Readme_2007_0018.pdf | application/pdf | 11 KB | 10/12/2019 08:11:AM |
mkbasic.do | text/plain | 6.4 KB | 10/12/2019 08:11:AM |
nycmayoralsurveydata.dta | application/octet-stream | 380.2 KB | 10/12/2019 08:11:AM |
senracelist.dta | application/octet-stream | 4 KB | 10/12/2019 08:11:AM |
table10.do | text/plain | 2.5 KB | 10/12/2019 08:11:AM |
table5.do | text/plain | 3.3 KB | 10/12/2019 08:11:AM |
table6.do | text/plain | 3.4 KB | 10/12/2019 08:11:AM |
table6_se.do | text/plain | 4.6 KB | 10/12/2019 08:11:AM |
table7.do | text/plain | 2.8 KB | 10/12/2019 08:11:AM |
- Total of 16 records. Records per page
- « previous Page of 2
- next »
Project Citation:
Mullainathan, Sendhil, and Washington, Ebonya. Replication data for: Sticking with Your Vote: Cognitive Dissonance and Political Attitudes. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2009. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E113555V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Cognitive dissonance theory predicts that the act of voting for a
candidate
leads to a more favorable opinion of the candidate in the
future. We find support for the empirical relevance of cognitive dissonance
to political attitudes. We examine the presidential opinion
ratings of voting-age eligibles and ineligibles two years after the president's
election. We find that eligibles show two to three times greater
polarization of opinions than comparable ineligibles. We find smaller
effects when we compare polarization in opinions of senators elected
during high turnout presidential campaign years with senators elected
during nonpresidential campaign years. (JEL D72)
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.