Replication data for: Standing United or Falling Divided? High Stakes Bargaining in a TV Game Show
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Dennie van Dolder; Martijn J. van den Assem; Colin F. Camerer; Richard H. Thaler
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
P2015_1017_data | 10/12/2019 10:16:AM | ||
LICENSE.txt | text/plain | 14.6 KB | 10/12/2019 06:16:AM |
Project Citation:
van Dolder, Dennie, van den Assem, Martijn J., Camerer, Colin F., and Thaler, Richard H. Replication data for: Standing United or Falling Divided? High Stakes Bargaining in a TV Game Show. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2015. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E113363V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
We examine high stakes three-person bargaining in a game show where contestants bargain over a large money amount that is split into three unequal shares. We find that individual behavior and outcomes are strongly influenced by equity concerns: those who contributed more to the jackpot claim larger shares, are less likely to make concessions, and take home larger amounts. Contestants who announce that they will not back down do well relative to others, but they do not secure larger absolute amounts and they harm others. There is no evidence of a first-mover advantage and little evidence that demographic characteristics matter.
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
C78 Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
L82 Entertainment; Media
C78 Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
L82 Entertainment; Media
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.