Replication data for: On the Possibility of Credit Rationing in the Stiglitz-Weiss Model
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Lutz G. Arnold; John G. Riley
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
20040970_data | 10/12/2019 10:06:AM | ||
|
application/pdf | 640.3 KB | 10/12/2019 06:06:AM |
|
text/plain | 14.6 KB | 10/12/2019 06:06:AM |
Project Citation:
Arnold, Lutz G., and Riley, John G. Replication data for: On the Possibility of Credit Rationing in the Stiglitz-Weiss Model. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2009. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E113341V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
Contrary to what is usually assumed, the expected revenue for lenders as a
function of the loan rate cannot be globally hump-shaped in the Stiglitz-Weiss
(1981) adverse selection model with a continuum of types. This has important
implications. First, if there is credit rationing, there must be at least two equilibrium
loan rates. Second, while at the low rate loans are rationed, all those
applicants willing to pay the high rate are then served. Numerical analysis
shows that unless the joint distribution of risk class and output is rather special,
the two loan rate outcome with rationing is unlikely. (JEL D82, G21)
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
D82 Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
G21 Banks; Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
D82 Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
G21 Banks; Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.