Replication data for: Strategic Leniency and Cartel Enforcement
Principal Investigator(s): View help for Principal Investigator(s) Nathan H. Miller
Version: View help for Version V1
Name | File Type | Size | Last Modified |
---|---|---|---|
data-appendix | 10/12/2019 09:09:AM | ||
LICENSE.txt | text/plain | 14.6 KB | 10/12/2019 05:09:AM |
Project Citation:
Miller, Nathan H. Replication data for: Strategic Leniency and Cartel Enforcement. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2009. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E113304V1
Project Description
Summary:
View help for Summary
The cornerstone of cartel enforcement in the United States and elsewhere is a
commitment to the lenient prosecution of early confessors. A burgeoning gametheoretical
literature is ambiguous regarding the impacts of leniency. I develop
a theoretical model of cartel behavior that provides empirical predictions and
moment conditions, and apply the model to the complete set of indictments and
information reports issued over a 20-year span. Statistical tests are consistent
with the notion that leniency enhances deterrence and detection capabilities.
The results have implications for market efficiency and enforcement efforts
against cartels and other forms of organized crime. (JEL D43, L12, L13, K21)
Scope of Project
JEL Classification:
View help for JEL Classification
D43 Market Structure, Pricing, and Design: Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
K21 Antitrust Law
L12 Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
L13 Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
D43 Market Structure, Pricing, and Design: Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
K21 Antitrust Law
L12 Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
L13 Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
Related Publications
Published Versions
Report a Problem
Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.
This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.