Name File Type Size Last Modified
  AER-2013-1048DataCodeReadme 10/12/2019 01:06:AM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/11/2019 09:06:PM

Project Citation: 

Ketcham, Jonathan D., Kuminoff, Nicolai V., and Powers, Christopher A. Replication data for: Choice Inconsistencies among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program: Comment. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2016. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E112944V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Consumers' enrollment decisions in Medicare Part D can be explained by Abaluck and Gruber's (2011) model of utility maximization with psychological biases or by a neoclassical version of their model that precludes such biases. We evaluate these competing hypotheses by applying nonparametric tests of utility maximization and model validation tests to administrative data. We find that 79 percent of enrollment decisions from 2006 to 2010 satisfied basic axioms of consumer theory under the assumption of full information. The validation tests provide evidence against widespread psychological biases. In particular, we find that precluding psychological biases improves the structural model's out-of-sample predictions for consumer behavior.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      C52 Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
      D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
      I13 Health Insurance, Public and Private
      I18 Health: Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
      J14 Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-labor Market Discrimination


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.