Name File Type Size Last Modified
  20131024_replication 10/19/2021 03:31:PM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/11/2019 08:59:PM

Project Citation: 

Bordignon, Massimo, Nannicini, Tommaso, and Tabellini, Guido. Replication data for: Moderating Political Extremism: Single Round versus Runoff Elections under Plurality Rule. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2016. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E112940V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary We compare single round versus runoff elections under plurality rule, allowing for partly endogenous party formation. Under runoff elections, the number of political candidates is larger, but the influence of extremist voters on equilibrium policy, and hence policy volatility, is smaller because the bargaining power of the political extremes is reduced compared to single round elections. The predictions on the number of candidates and on policy volatility are confirmed by evidence from a regression discontinuity design in Italy, where cities above 15,000 inhabitants elect the mayor with a runoff system, while those below hold single round elections.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms electoral rules; political extremism
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      C78 Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
      D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Italy
Universe:  View help for Universe population, number of candidates for mayor ,and policy outcomes (tax rates) of all Italian municipalities
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) administrative records data; census/enumeration data; other:

Methodology

Data Source:  View help for Data Source Italian Minister of the INterior and Italian statistical agency
Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation municipalities,

Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.