Name File Type Size Last Modified
Front Study 1.sav application/x-spss-sav 61.9 KB 05/07/2020 04:47:AM
Front Study 2 Table 2 BFM100 Swed.sav application/x-spss-sav 4 MB 05/07/2020 04:47:AM
Front Study 2 Table 2 English NB5I.sav application/x-spss-sav 99.5 KB 10/19/2018 03:13:AM
Front Study 2 Table 2 Swedish NB5I.sav application/x-spss-sav 105.1 KB 10/15/2018 08:43:PM
Front Study 3 English NB5ICore.sav application/x-spss-sav 460.8 KB 10/15/2018 08:46:PM
Front Study 3 Swedish NBFICore.sav application/x-spss-sav 309.5 KB 07/02/2018 07:50:PM
Front Study 3 Swedish.sav application/x-spss-sav 34.6 KB 05/27/2019 10:59:PM
Front Study3.sav application/x-spss-sav 41.9 KB 10/15/2018 09:55:PM

Project Citation: 

Bäckström, Martin. The properties and utility of less evaluative personality scales: Reduction of social desirability; increase of construct and discriminant validity. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-05-08. https://doi.org/10.3886/E106360V6

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Evaluative neutralization implies rephrasing items such that it is less clear to the respondent what would be a desirable response in the given population. The current research introduces evaluatively neutralized scales measuring the FFM model and compares them with standard counterparts. Study 1 reveals that evaluatively neutralized scales are less influenced by social desirability. Study 2 estimates higher-order factor models for neutralized vs. standard five-factor scales. In contrast to standard inventories, there was little support for higher-order factors for neutralized scales. Study 3 demonstrates the convergent and discriminant validity for the neutralized scales, e.g. by less inflated correlations to external measures. It is argued that evaluatively neutralized inventories help researchers come to grips with social desirability in personality measurement, and are particularly useful when the factor structure is central to the research question and there is a focus on discriminant validity. 



Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.